-
Recent Articles
- Trumpet Blasts and Assembly Syntax in Numbers 10:3
- Right and Left: A Beginner’s Guide to Hebrew Word Order in Ecclesiastes 10:2
- A Call to Listen: A Beginner’s Guide to Hebrew Grammar in Jeremiah 10:1
- “Even If I Wash with Snow”: Job’s Cry of Purity and Futility in Hebrew
- Your People and Your Inheritance: Strength and Arm Between Hebrew and Greek
- Who is Abimelek? Political Defiance in Hebrew Speech
- May God Enlarge Japheth: Syntax, Blessing, and Subordination in Genesis 9:27
- The Plea of the Prophet: Syntax, Intercession, and Covenant Echoes in Deuteronomy 9:26
- The Swift Flight of Life: Syntax and Poetic Motion in Job 9:25
- Fear and Syntax in Giveʿon: Nested Clauses and Theological Strategy in Joshua 9:24
- Wayyiqtol Verbs, Ruach Imagery, and Political Betrayal in Judges 9:23
- Imperatives, Prophetic Syntax, and Stark Imagery in Jeremiah 9:22
Categories
Archives
Jussive Negation with אַל and the Function of Double Prohibition
אַ֥ךְ אִ֛ישׁ אַל־יָרֵ֖ב וְאַל־יֹוכַ֣ח אִ֑ישׁ וְעַמְּךָ֖ כִּמְרִיבֵ֥י כֹהֵֽן׃
(Hosea 4:4)
Yet let no man contend, and let no man rebuke, for your people are like those who contend with a priest.
Hosea 4:4 stands at the beginning of a prophetic indictment. It opens with a forceful double prohibition, warning against judgmental contention, followed by a striking comparison between the people and the priest. The grammatical structure uses the particle אַל to negate jussive verbs twice in parallel, creating a rhetorical double command.… Learn Hebrew
Volitive Forms and Rhetorical Irony in Zephaniah 3:7: A Grammatical Theology of Rejected Correction
אָמַ֜רְתִּי אַךְ־תִּירְאִ֤י אֹותִי֙ תִּקְחִ֣י מוּסָ֔ר וְלֹֽא־יִכָּרֵ֣ת מְעֹונָ֔הּ כֹּ֥ל אֲשֶׁר־פָּקַ֖דְתִּי עָלֶ֑יהָ אָכֵן֙ הִשְׁכִּ֣ימוּ הִשְׁחִ֔יתוּ כֹּ֖ל עֲלִילֹותָֽם׃
I said, “Surely you will fear Me, you will accept correction.” Then her dwelling would not be cut off—[not] all that I had appointed against her. But they rose early—they corrupted all their deeds.
Divine Expectation and Human Defiance in Prophetic Discourse
Zephaniah 3:7 is a striking verse in the prophet’s closing oracle of judgment, where YHWH reflects on His prior disciplinary intent and Israel’s refusal to respond.… Learn Hebrew
Posted in Grammar
Tagged Zephaniah 3:7
Comments Off on Volitive Forms and Rhetorical Irony in Zephaniah 3:7: A Grammatical Theology of Rejected Correction
The Hebrew Verb בּוֹא: To Come, Enter, or Arrive
The Hebrew verb בּוֹא (root: ב-ו-א) is a high-frequency irregular verb that means “to come,” “to go in,” “to enter,” or “to arrive.” It occurs in narrative, legal, and poetic contexts and is essential for expressing movement toward a place or event. It frequently appears with prepositions like אֶל (“to”) or בְּ (“in”).
Because it is a hollow verb (middle root is ו), its forms are highly irregular in some tenses and must be memorized. It appears most frequently in the Qal binyan, with some occurrences in Hiphil (causative: “to bring in”).… Learn Hebrew
The Syntax of Legal Hypotheticals and Priestly Responsibility in Leviticus 4:3
אִ֣ם הַכֹּהֵ֧ן הַמָּשִׁ֛יחַ יֶחֱטָ֖א לְאַשְׁמַ֣ת הָעָ֑ם וְהִקְרִ֡יב עַ֣ל חַטָּאתֹו֩ אֲשֶׁ֨ר חָטָ֜א פַּ֣ר בֶּן־בָּקָ֥ר תָּמִ֛ים לַיהוָ֖ה לְחַטָּֽאת׃
(Leviticus 4:3)
If the anointed priest sins, bringing guilt upon the people, then he shall bring for his sin that he has committed a bull of the herd without blemish to the LORD as a sin offering.
Legal Instruction and Theological Stakes in Leviticus 4:3
Leviticus 4:3 introduces the procedures for sin offerings (חַטָּאת) in the case of unintentional sin by the anointed priest. This passage inaugurates one of the most structurally detailed sacrificial regulations in the Torah.… Learn Hebrew
Posted in Grammar, Syntax, Theology
Tagged Leviticus 4:3
Comments Off on The Syntax of Legal Hypotheticals and Priestly Responsibility in Leviticus 4:3
The Semantics and Theology of the Nifʿal Imperfect in Isaiah 4:3
וְהָיָ֣ה הַנִּשְׁאָ֣ר בְּצִיֹּ֗ון וְהַנֹּותָר֙ בִּיר֣וּשָׁלִַ֔ם קָדֹ֖ושׁ יֵאָ֣מֶר לֹ֑ו כָּל־הַכָּת֥וּב לַחַיִּ֖ים בִּירוּשָׁלִָֽם׃
(Isaiah 4:3)
And the one who is left in Tsiyyon and the one who remains in Yerushalayim will be called holy, everyone who is written down for life in Yerushalayim.
Contextual and Theological Framing of Isaiah 4:3
Isaiah 4:3 appears at a pivotal juncture in the prophetic literature of Isaiah, marking a thematic shift from divine judgment to purification and restoration. The verse reads:
Situated within the oracle of Isaiah 2–4, this verse belongs to a broader literary unit that envisions Zion’s eschatological cleansing.… Learn Hebrew
Posted in Grammar, Theology
Tagged Isaiah 4:3
Comments Off on The Semantics and Theology of the Nifʿal Imperfect in Isaiah 4:3
The Hebrew Verb בָּהַל: To Terrify or Alarm
The Hebrew verb בָּהַל (root: ב-ה-ל) means “to terrify,” “to alarm,” “to hasten in fear,” or “to panic.” It typically describes sudden emotional or mental disturbance—such as fear, confusion, or urgency—often in response to shocking or overwhelming circumstances. This verb is used in poetic, prophetic, and narrative contexts in the Hebrew Bible.
It is most commonly found in the Qal binyan and sometimes in the Niphal (passive or reflexive, “to be terrified”) or Piel (intensive causative, “to cause terror”).
Qal Binyan Conjugation of בָּהַל
Past (Perfect) Tense
Person
Form
1st person singular
בָּהַלְתִּי
2nd person masculine singular
בָּהַלְתָּ
2nd person feminine singular
בָּהַלְתְּ
3rd person masculine singular
בָּהַל
3rd person feminine singular
בָּהֲלָה
1st person plural
בָּהַלְנוּ
2nd person masculine plural
בְּהַלְתֶּם
2nd person feminine plural
בְּהַלְתֶּן
3rd person plural
בָּהֲלוּ
Present (Participle) Tense
Gender/Number
Form
Masculine singular
בֹּהֵל
Feminine singular
בֹּהֶלֶת
Masculine plural
בֹּהֲלִים
Feminine plural
בֹּהֲלוֹת
Future (Imperfect) Tense
Person
Form
1st person singular
אֶבְהַל
2nd person masculine singular
תִּבְהַל
2nd person feminine singular
תִּבְהֲלִי
3rd person masculine singular
יִבְהַל
3rd person feminine singular
תִּבְהַל
1st person plural
נִבְהַל
2nd person masculine plural
תִּבְהֲלוּ
2nd person feminine plural
תִּבְהַלְנָה
3rd person plural
יִבְהֲלוּ
Imperative Mood
Person
Form
2nd person masculine singular
בְּהַל
2nd person feminine singular
בַּהֲלִי
2nd person masculine plural
בַּהֲלוּ
2nd person feminine plural
בְּהַלְנָה
Usage in Scripture
Daniel 5:6 – וְהִתְבַּהֲלוּ מְתַנֵּה
“His limbs were terrified…” — describing the sudden fear of King Belshazzar when he saw the handwriting on the wall.… Learn Hebrew
Comparative Particles and Temporal Subordination in Qohelet’s Reasoning
וְשַׁבֵּ֧חַ אֲנִ֛י אֶת־הַמֵּתִ֖ים שֶׁכְּבָ֣ר מֵ֑תוּ מִן־הַ֣חַיִּ֔ים אֲשֶׁ֛ר הֵ֥מָּה חַיִּ֖ים עֲדֶֽנָה׃
(Ecclesiastes 4:2)
And I praised the dead who had already died more than the living who are still alive.
Ecclesiastes 4:2 presents a comparison between the dead and the living, asserting that the dead are better off. The verse is marked by layered comparative and temporal clauses, joined by particles such as מִן (“than”) and עֲדֶנָה (“still”). The grammatical structure illustrates how Qohelet constructs philosophical comparisons through concise and ambiguous Hebrew syntax.… Learn Hebrew
Posted in Grammar, Syntax
Tagged Ecclesiastes 4:2
Comments Off on Comparative Particles and Temporal Subordination in Qohelet’s Reasoning
Exodus 4:2 – Interrogative Pronoun and Demonstrative Use of מַה־זֶּה
וַיֹּ֧אמֶר אֵלָ֛יו יְהוָ֖ה מַה־זֶּה בְיָדֶ֑ךָ וַיֹּ֖אמֶר מַטֶּֽה׃
(Exodus 4:2)
And YHWH said to him, “What is that in your hand?” And he said, “A staff.”
This verse from Exodus 4:2 presents a clear example of a Hebrew interrogative clause introduced by the compound expression מַה־זֶּה (“What is this…?”). The interrogative מַה (“what”) is joined with the demonstrative זֶּה (“this”), forming a common question phrase that appears throughout narrative Hebrew.
This construction is followed by a prepositional phrase בְיָדֶךָ (“in your hand”), which completes the interrogative clause.… Learn Hebrew
Posted in Grammar
Tagged Exodus 4:2
Comments Off on Exodus 4:2 – Interrogative Pronoun and Demonstrative Use of מַה־זֶּה
Deuteronomy 4:1 – Imperative, Infinitive Purpose, and Participial Construction
וְעַתָּ֣ה יִשְׂרָאֵ֗ל שְׁמַ֤ע אֶל־הַֽחֻקִּים֙ וְאֶל־הַמִּשְׁפָּטִ֔ים אֲשֶׁ֧ר אָֽנֹכִ֛י מְלַמֵּ֥ד אֶתְכֶ֖ם לַעֲשֹׂ֑ות לְמַ֣עַן תִּֽחְי֗וּ וּבָאתֶם֙ וִֽירִשְׁתֶּ֣ם אֶת־הָאָ֔רֶץ אֲשֶׁ֧ר יְהוָ֛ה אֱלֹהֵ֥י אֲבֹתֵיכֶ֖ם נֹתֵ֥ן לָכֶֽם׃
(Deuteronomy 4:1)
And now, Yisra’el, listen to the statutes and to the judgments that I am teaching you to do, so that you may live and go in and possess the land that YHWH, the God of your fathers, is giving to you.
This verse from Deuteronomy 4:1 features a blend of grammatical forms typical of covenant exhortation:
1. Imperative verb with direct object for authoritative instruction,
2.… Learn Hebrew
Posted in Grammar
Tagged Deuteronomy 4:1
Comments Off on Deuteronomy 4:1 – Imperative, Infinitive Purpose, and Participial Construction
Double Wayyiqtol Narrative Framing in Dialogic Introductions
וַ֭יַּעַן אֱלִיפַ֥ז הַֽתֵּימָנִ֗י וַיֹּאמַֽר׃
(Job 4:1)
Then Eliphaz the Temanite answered and said:
Job 4:1 marks the beginning of the first response to Job’s lament. The verse introduces the speech of Elifaz the Temani using a formula common in biblical narrative and dialogue: two sequential wayyiqtol verbs, וַיַּעַן (“and he answered”) and וַיֹּאמַר (“and he said”). This construction creates a formal transition into direct speech and is characteristic of Hebrew dialogue conventions. This lesson explores the grammatical and rhetorical function of double wayyiqtol verbs in introducing biblical speeches.… Learn Hebrew