Category Archives: Grammar & Syntax

Aramaic Grammar and Syntax

The Peʿal Imperfect as a Petitionary Form in Daniel 2:16

וְדָ֣נִיֵּ֔אל עַ֖ל וּבְעָ֣ה מִן־מַלְכָּ֑א דִּ֚י זְמָ֣ן יִנְתֵּן־לֵ֔הּ וּפִשְׁרָ֖א לְהַֽחֲוָיָ֥ה לְמַלְכָּֽא׃
(Daniel 2:16) And Daniel went in and requested from the king that time may be given to him, and that he might declare the interpretation to the king. The form יִנְתֵּן in Daniel 2:16 provides a vivid example of how Biblical Aramaic uses verbal morphology and syntax to frame a… Read the rest
Posted in Grammar & Syntax | Tagged | Comments Off on The Peʿal Imperfect as a Petitionary Form in Daniel 2:16

Exploring the Emphatic State in the Title שַׁלִּיטָ֣א

עָנֵ֣ה וְאָמַ֗ר לְאַרְיֹוךְ֙ שַׁלִּיטָ֣א דִֽי־מַלְכָּ֔א עַל־מָ֥ה דָתָ֛א מְהַחְצְפָ֖ה מִן־קֳדָ֣ם מַלְכָּ֑א אֱדַ֣יִן מִלְּתָ֔א הֹודַ֥ע אַרְיֹ֖וךְ לְדָנִיֵּֽאל׃
(Daniel 2:15) He answered and said to Arioch, the official of the king, “Why is the decree so urgent from before the king?” Then Arioch made the matter known to Daniel. In this verse, the word שַׁלִּיטָ֣א (“the official” or “the ruler”) appears in the… Read the rest
Posted in Grammar & Syntax | Tagged | Comments Off on Exploring the Emphatic State in the Title שַׁלִּיטָ֣א

Unpacking the Relative Particle דִּי in Daniel 2:14

בֵּאדַ֣יִן דָּנִיֵּ֗אל הֲתִיב֙ עֵטָ֣א וּטְעֵ֔ם לְאַרְיֹ֕וךְ רַב־טַבָּחַיָּ֖א דִּ֣י מַלְכָּ֑א דִּ֚י נְפַ֣ק לְקַטָּלָ֔ה לְחַכִּימֵ֖י בָּבֶֽל׃
(Daniel 2:14) Then Daniel replied with counsel and prudence to Arioch, chief of the king’s guard, who had gone out to kill the wise men of Babylon. In Biblical Aramaic, the particle דִּי functions primarily as a relative pronoun, equivalent to “who,” “which,” or “that” in… Read the rest
Posted in Grammar & Syntax | Tagged | Comments Off on Unpacking the Relative Particle דִּי in Daniel 2:14

Death Decreed: Aramaic Grammar of Persecution in Daniel 2:13

וְדָתָ֣א נֶפְקַ֔ת וְחַכִּֽימַיָּ֖א מִֽתְקַטְּלִ֑ין וּבְעֹ֛ו דָּנִיֵּ֥אל וְחַבְרֹ֖והִי לְהִתְקְטָלָֽה׃
(Daniel 2:13) And the decree went out, and the wise men were being killed, and they sought Daniyyel and his companions to be killed. Context and Structure This verse continues the intensifying narrative after the king’s eruption in Daniel 2:12. We now move from royal fury to administrative execution. This verse highlights… Read the rest
Posted in Grammar & Syntax, Theology | Tagged | Comments Off on Death Decreed: Aramaic Grammar of Persecution in Daniel 2:13

Wrath and Decree: Volition and Intensity in Daniel 2:12

כָּל־קֳבֵ֣ל דְּנָ֔ה מַלְכָּ֕א בְּנַ֖ס וּקְצַ֣ף שַׂגִּ֑יא וַאֲמַר֙ לְהֹ֣ובָדָ֔ה לְכֹ֖ל חַכִּימֵ֥י בָבֶֽל׃
(Daniel 2:12) Because of this, the king became furious and very angry, and he ordered to destroy all the wise men of Babylon. From Protest to Punishment Daniel 2:12 marks a turning point in the narrative. After the Chaldeans admit they cannot fulfill the king’s demand (Daniel 2:10–11), Nebuchadnezzar… Read the rest
Posted in Grammar & Syntax | Tagged | Comments Off on Wrath and Decree: Volition and Intensity in Daniel 2:12

The Existential Particle אִית Revisited: Theology and Ontology in Daniel 2:11

וּמִלְּתָ֨א דִֽי־מַלְכָּ֤ה שָׁאֵל֙ יַקִּירָ֔ה וְאָחֳרָן֙ לָ֣א אִיתַ֔י דִּ֥י יְחַוִּנַּ֖הּ קֳדָ֣ם מַלְכָּ֑א לָהֵ֣ן אֱלָהִ֔ין דִּ֚י מְדָ֣רְהֹ֔ון עִם־בִּשְׂרָ֖א לָ֥א אִיתֹֽוהִי׃
(Daniel 2:11) And the thing that the king demands is difficult, and there is no other who can declare it before the king—except the gods, whose dwelling is not with flesh.” A Double Negation with Divine Implication Daniel 2:11 continues the Chaldeans’… Read the rest
Posted in Grammar & Syntax, Theology | Tagged | Comments Off on The Existential Particle אִית Revisited: Theology and Ontology in Daniel 2:11

The Aramaic Existential Particle אִית and Negative Existentials in Daniel 2:10

עֲנֹ֨ו כַשְׂדָּיָּא קֳדָם־מַלְכָּא֙ וְאָ֣מְרִ֔ין לָֽא־אִיתַ֤י אֲנָשׁ֙ עַל־יַבֶּשְׁתָּ֔א דִּ֚י מִלַּ֣ת מַלְכָּ֔א יוּכַ֖ל לְהַחֲוָיָ֑ה כָּל־קֳבֵ֗ל דִּ֚י כָּל־מֶ֨לֶךְ֙ רַ֣ב וְשַׁלִּ֔יט מִלָּ֤ה כִדְנָה֙ לָ֣א שְׁאֵ֔ל לְכָל־חַרְטֹּ֖ם וְאָשַׁ֥ף וְכַשְׂדָּֽי׃
(Daniel 2:10) The Chaldeans answered before the king and said, “There is no man on earth who is able to declare the matter of the king; for no great and powerful king has ever asked such… Read the rest
Posted in Grammar & Syntax | Tagged | Comments Off on The Aramaic Existential Particle אִית and Negative Existentials in Daniel 2:10

Tense, Threat, and Timing: The Hitpaʿal Imperfect יִשְׁתַּנֵּא in Daniel 2:9

דִּ֣י הֵן־חֶלְמָא֩ לָ֨א תְהֹֽודְעֻנַּ֜נִי חֲדָה־הִ֣יא דָֽתְכֹ֗ון וּמִלָּ֨ה כִדְבָ֤ה וּשְׁחִיתָה֙ הַזְמַנְתּ֔וּן לְמֵאמַ֣ר קָֽדָמַ֔י עַ֛ד דִּ֥י עִדָּנָ֖א יִשְׁתַּנֵּ֑א לָהֵ֗ן חֶלְמָא֙ אֱמַ֣רוּ לִ֔י וְֽאִנְדַּ֕ע דִּ֥י פִשְׁרֵ֖הּ תְּהַחֲוֻנַּֽנִי׃
(Daniel 2:9) If you do not make the dream known to me, there is one sentence for you. You have agreed to speak a lying and corrupt word before me until the time changes. Therefore tell… Read the rest
Posted in Grammar & Syntax | Tagged | Comments Off on Tense, Threat, and Timing: The Hitpaʿal Imperfect יִשְׁתַּנֵּא in Daniel 2:9

Buying Time: The Participle זָבְנִין and Present-Tense Action in Biblical Aramaic

עָנֵ֤ה מַלְכָּא֙ וְאָמַ֔ר מִן־יַצִּיב֙ יָדַ֣ע אֲנָ֔ה דִּ֥י עִדָּנָ֖א אַנְתּ֣וּן זָבְנִ֑ין כָּל־קֳבֵל֙ דִּ֣י חֲזֵיתֹ֔ון דִּ֥י אַזְדָּ֖א מִנִּ֥י מִלְּתָֽא׃
(Daniel 2:8) The king answered and said, “Surely I know that you are buying time, because you have seen that the matter has gone from me.” A King’s Suspicion and a Syntax of Accusation In Daniel 2:8, King Nebuchadnezzar levels an accusation with… Read the rest
Posted in Grammar & Syntax | Tagged | Comments Off on Buying Time: The Participle זָבְנִין and Present-Tense Action in Biblical Aramaic

The Peʿal Imperfect as Jussive: Soft Imperatives in the Royal Court

עֲנֹ֥ו תִנְיָנ֖וּת וְאָמְרִ֑ין מַלְכָּ֕א חֶלְמָ֛א יֵאמַ֥ר לְעַבְדֹ֖והִי וּפִשְׁרָ֥ה נְהַחֲוֵֽה׃
(Daniel 2:7) They answered a second time and said, “Let the king tell the dream to his servants, and we will declare its interpretation.” A Verse of Repetition and Resistance Daniel 2:7 marks a critical moment in the Chaldeans’ dialogue with Nebuchadnezzar. Their second answer does not contain new information—it repeats… Read the rest
Posted in Grammar & Syntax | Tagged | Comments Off on The Peʿal Imperfect as Jussive: Soft Imperatives in the Royal Court