Author Archives: ivrit

Rāphè

Rāphè (רָפֶה‎ i.e. weak, soft), a horizontal stroke over the letter, is the opposite of both kinds of Dageš and Mappîq, but especially of Dageš lene. In exact manuscripts every בגדכפת‎ letter has either Dageš lene or Rāphè, e.g. מֶלֶךְֿ‎ mèlĕkh, … Continue reading

Posted in Grammar | Tagged | Comments Off on Rāphè

Mappîq

1. Mappîq, llke Dageš, also a point within the consonant, serves in the letters א ה ו י‎ as a sign that they are to be regarded as full consonants and not as vowel letters. In most editions of the … Continue reading

Posted in Grammar | Tagged | Comments Off on Mappîq

Hebrew Phonology

Hebrew Vowels The original Hebrew alphabet consisted only of consonants and vowel letters. The vowel signs and pronunciation (known as vowel pointings) currently accepted for Biblical Hebrew were created by scholars known as Masoretes after the 5th century AD and … Continue reading

Posted in Grammar | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Hebrew Phonology

Qal (The Pure Stem)

The common form of the 3rd sing. masc. of the Perfect Qal is קָטַל‎, with ă (Pathaḥ) in the second syllable, especially in transitive verbs. There is also a form with ē (Ṣere, originally ĭ), and another with ō (Ḥolem, … Continue reading

Posted in Grammar | Tagged | Comments Off on Qal (The Pure Stem)

Dageš Forte

In grammar Dageš forte, the sign of strengthening, is the more important. It may be compared to the sicilicus of the Latins (Lucul̂us for Lucullus) or to the stroke over m̄ and n̄. In the unpointed text it is omitted, … Continue reading

Posted in Grammar | Tagged | Comments Off on Dageš Forte

Dageš

Dageš, a point standing in the middle of a consonant, denotes,  (a) the strengthening of a consonant (Dageš forte), e.g. קִטֵּל‎ qiṭṭēl ; or (b) the harder pronunciation of the letters בְּגַדְכְּפַת‎ (Dageš lene). The root דגשׁ‎ in Syriac means to … Continue reading

Posted in Grammar | Tagged | Leave a comment

Dageš Lene

1. Dageš lene, the sign of hardening, is in ordinary printed texts placed only within the בְּגַדְכְּפַת‎ letters as a sign that they should be pronounced with their original hard sound (without aspiration), e.g. מֶלֶךְ‎ mèlĕkh, but מַלְכּוֹ‎ mal-kô; תָּפַר‎ tāphár, but יִתְפֹּר‎ yith-pōr; … Continue reading

Posted in Grammar | Tagged | Comments Off on Dageš Lene

Grammatical Structure

1. The formation of the parts of speech from the stems (derivation), and their inflexion, are effected in two ways: (a) internally by changes in the stem itself, particularly in its vowels: (b) externally by the addition of formative syllables … Continue reading

Posted in Grammar | Tagged | Comments Off on Grammatical Structure

Semitic Languages

1. The Hebrew language is one branch of a great family of languages in Western Asia which was indigenous in Palestine, Phoenicia, Syria, Mesopotamia, Babylonia, Assyria, and Arabia, that is to say, in the countries extending from the Mediterranean to … Continue reading

Posted in Grammar | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Semitic Languages

Niphal (Niph˓al)

1. The essential characteristic of this conjugation consists in a prefix to the stem. This exists in two forms: (a) the (probably original) prepositive nă, as in the Hebrew perfect and participle, although in the strong verb the ă is … Continue reading

Posted in Grammar | Tagged , | Comments Off on Niphal (Niph˓al)