In grammar Dageš forte, the sign of strengthening, is the more important. It may be compared to the sicilicus of the Latins (Lucul̂us for Lucullus) or to the stroke over m̄ and n̄. In the unpointed text it is omitted, like the vowels and other reading signs. Oort, Theol. Tijdschr. 1902, p. 376, maintains that ‘the Masoretes recognized no distinction between Dageš lene and forte. They used a Dageš where they considered that a letter had the sharp, not the soft or aspirated sound.’ This may be true; but the old-established distinction between the two kinds of Dageš is essential for the right understanding of the grammatical forms.
-
Recent Articles
- The Etymology of Hebrew Words: Tracing the Roots of Biblical Meaning
- “You Shall Speak, He Shall Send”: Distributive Prophetic Roles in Translation
- Polysemy in Biblical Hebrew: One Word, Many Worlds
- The Binyanim That Open the Ark: How Form and Function Shape Genesis 7:1
- Verb–Subject–Object (VSO) Word Order in Biblical Hebrew: Syntax, Style, and Theology
- Calls for Blood: Sequential Imperatives and Double Causal כִּי
- Perfect and Imperfect Verbs in Biblical Hebrew: Understanding Completed and Ongoing Action
- “Speak What I Speak”: Mirroring Divine Speech in the Septuagint
- Main Clauses: How Independent Clauses Function in Biblical Hebrew
- On the Day YHWH Spoke: Learning Hebrew Narrative Structure in Exodus 6:28
- Two Voices, One Mission: The Syntactic Unity of Aaron and Moshe in Hebrew and Greek
- Pointing Them Out: Hebrew Grammar in Exodus 6:26
Categories
Archives