In grammar Dageš forte, the sign of strengthening, is the more important. It may be compared to the sicilicus of the Latins (Lucul̂us for Lucullus) or to the stroke over m̄ and n̄. In the unpointed text it is omitted, like the vowels and other reading signs. Oort, Theol. Tijdschr. 1902, p. 376, maintains that ‘the Masoretes recognized no distinction between Dageš lene and forte. They used a Dageš where they considered that a letter had the sharp, not the soft or aspirated sound.’ This may be true; but the old-established distinction between the two kinds of Dageš is essential for the right understanding of the grammatical forms.
-
Recent Articles
- Sequential Action and Leadership: The Wayyiqtol Chain in Judges 3:27
- Internal Monologue and Root-Derived Wordplay in Obadiah 1:3
- Temporal Clauses and Narrative Framing in Numbers 26:1
- The Hebrew Verb אִמֵּץ: To Strengthen and Encourage
- Negative Imperatives and Prohibitions in Leviticus 26:1
- Sequential Perfects and Future Conditionals in Deuteronomy 26:1
- The Hebrew Verb הֶאֱמִין: To Believe and Trust
- Introduction to Biblical Hebrew Phonology
- The Hebrew Root א-מ-ן: Meanings, Binyanim, and Development
- The Hebrew Verb אִלֵּץ: To Compel or Force or Urge
- “Forty Stripes He May Give Him, He Shall Not Add”: Legal Limits and Syntactic Boundaries in Deuteronomy 25:3
- “Rising Early to Speak”: Temporal Expressions and Iterative Syntax in Jeremiah 25:3
Categories