In grammar Dageš forte, the sign of strengthening, is the more important. It may be compared to the sicilicus of the Latins (Lucul̂us for Lucullus) or to the stroke over m̄ and n̄. In the unpointed text it is omitted, like the vowels and other reading signs. Oort, Theol. Tijdschr. 1902, p. 376, maintains that ‘the Masoretes recognized no distinction between Dageš lene and forte. They used a Dageš where they considered that a letter had the sharp, not the soft or aspirated sound.’ This may be true; but the old-established distinction between the two kinds of Dageš is essential for the right understanding of the grammatical forms.
-
Recent Articles
- Quiet Binyanim in a Genealogy: How Form Shapes Ancestral Flow
- The Hebrew Verb זָקֵן: To Grow Old, Become Aged
- Bitter Waters and Hidden Binyanim: The Verb Forms Behind the Trial of Jealousy
- The Hebrew Verb זִמֵּן: To Appoint, Prepare, or Designate (Post-Biblical)
- Chronology and Conjunction: Coordinated Cardinal Numbers in Biblical Hebrew
- The Hebrew Verb זָכַר: To Remember, Recall, or Be Mindful
- Living and Dying in Syntax: Waw-Consecutive and Numerical Structure in Genealogies
- The Hebrew Verb זָכָה: To Be Innocent, To Be Pure, or To Attain
- Who Has Heard and Lived? — Interrogatives, Apposition, and the Grammar of Wonder
- The Hebrew Verb זָחַל: To Crawl, Creep, or Slither
- What Turned It All Away — Fronted Guilt and the Syntax of Withheld Goodness
- The Hebrew Verb הָרַס: To Destroy, Tear Down, or Demolish
Categories