In grammar Dageš forte, the sign of strengthening, is the more important. It may be compared to the sicilicus of the Latins (Lucul̂us for Lucullus) or to the stroke over m̄ and n̄. In the unpointed text it is omitted, like the vowels and other reading signs. Oort, Theol. Tijdschr. 1902, p. 376, maintains that ‘the Masoretes recognized no distinction between Dageš lene and forte. They used a Dageš where they considered that a letter had the sharp, not the soft or aspirated sound.’ This may be true; but the old-established distinction between the two kinds of Dageš is essential for the right understanding of the grammatical forms.
-
Recent Articles
- The Directional ה (He) in Biblical Hebrew: A Comprehensive Analysis
- Similarities Between Hebrew and Arabic
- The Differences Between Hebrew and Arabic
- Similarities Between Hebrew and Syriac
- The Differences Between Hebrew and Syriac
- Similarities Between Hebrew and Aramaic
- The Differences Between Hebrew and Aramaic
- Ketib and Qere: Textual Variants and Oral Tradition in the Masoretic Hebrew Bible
- The Notation of Ketib and Qere in the Masoretic Manuscripts of the Hebrew Bible
- The Construct State in Biblical Hebrew: Structure and Significance
- The Prefix Conjugation (Imperfect) in Biblical Hebrew: Nuances and Usage
- The Cessation of Hebrew as a Popular Language Among Jews
Categories