In grammar Dageš forte, the sign of strengthening, is the more important. It may be compared to the sicilicus of the Latins (Lucul̂us for Lucullus) or to the stroke over m̄ and n̄. In the unpointed text it is omitted, like the vowels and other reading signs. Oort, Theol. Tijdschr. 1902, p. 376, maintains that ‘the Masoretes recognized no distinction between Dageš lene and forte. They used a Dageš where they considered that a letter had the sharp, not the soft or aspirated sound.’ This may be true; but the old-established distinction between the two kinds of Dageš is essential for the right understanding of the grammatical forms.
-
Recent Articles
- The Role of Matres Lectionis in Preserving Biblical Texts
- Matres Lectionis in Biblical Hebrew
- The Semitic Languages
- The Revival of Hebrew: From Sacred Tongue to Living Language
- Overview of Ancient Semitic Languages
- History of Classical Hebrew
- Comparison of Biblical Hebrew and Mishnaic Hebrew
- 10 Hebrew Names of God Found in the Bible: Unveiling the Divine Identity
- Josephus and the Greek Terms Ἑβραῖος and Ἑβραϊστί
- Jewish Scholars of the Tiberian Schools in the 7th Century A.D.
- Hebrew in the Context of Semitic Languages
- Lesson on Biblical Hebrew Adjectives
Categories