Ordinal numbers in Biblical Hebrew function as positional adjectives, agreeing in gender and definiteness with the nouns they modify and typically appearing in attributive structures (e.g., הַיּוֹם הַשְּׁלִישִׁי, “the third day”). Their placement usually follows the noun, though poetic inversion occasionally occurs for emphasis. Construct chains omit the definite article on the ordinal (יוֹם שְׁלִישִׁי לַחֹדֶשׁ), while elliptical usage allows ordinals to stand as noun heads in calendrical or ritual contexts. In both narrative and legal genres, ordinals serve as structural anchors, often carrying symbolic weight (e.g., “seventh” implying completion). Their consistent yet nuanced placement supports Hebrew’s grammatical precision and theological richness.
The Nature of Ordinal Numbers in Biblical Hebrew
Ordinal numbers in Biblical Hebrew express the sequence or order of elements in time, space, or structure, such as “first,” “second,” “third,” etc. Unlike cardinal numbers, which refer to quantity, ordinals reflect position within a series. The earliest ordinals (first through tenth) are typically distinct lexical forms and fully inflected for gender. Ordinals beyond ten are regularly formed using a construct chain involving the cardinal number with the word עָשָׂר (“ten”).
In Biblical Hebrew, ordinal numbers must agree with the noun they modify in gender and definiteness. This agreement system follows the same rules as adjectives in attributive constructions.
Basic Formation and Agreement Rules
The table below illustrates the forms of ordinal numbers from first to tenth in both masculine and feminine forms:
Ordinal Position | Masculine Form | Feminine Form |
---|---|---|
First | רִאשׁוֹן | רִאשׁוֹנָה |
Second | שֵׁנִי | שֵׁנִית |
Third | שְׁלִישִׁי | שְׁלִישִׁית |
Fourth | רְבִיעִי | רְבִיעִית |
Fifth | חֲמִישִׁי | חֲמִישִׁית |
Sixth | שִׁשִּׁי | שִׁשִּׁית |
Seventh | שְׁבִיעִי | שְׁבִיעִית |
Eighth | שְׁמִינִי | שְׁמִינִית |
Ninth | תְּשִׁיעִי | תְּשִׁיעִית |
Tenth | עֲשִׂירִי | עֲשִׂירִית |
Definiteness and Article Placement
When the noun being modified is definite (e.g., “the day”), the ordinal must also be made definite by adding the prefix הַ־ (“the”). This is a central rule in attributive constructions. For example:
הַיּוֹם הַשְּׁלִישִׁי
This phrase means “the third day.” Note that both הַיּוֹם (“the day”) and הַשְּׁלִישִׁי (“the third”) are marked with the definite article. Definiteness must match across the phrase.
In contrast, if the ordinal is used predicatively (e.g., “the day is third”), only the subject may carry the article:
הַיּוֹם שְׁלִישִׁי
This construct places emphasis on classification or identification rather than attributive description.
Standard Word Order and Variation
The default order in attributive phrases is:
[NOUN] + [ORDINAL]
Example:
הַבֵּן הַשֵּׁנִי
“The second son”
However, variation in word order can occur for topicalization, poetic emphasis, or focus. In such cases, the ordinal may precede the noun, especially in poetic or elevated language. For example:
הַשֵּׁנִי בֵּן
(This is uncommon in prose and may occur for poetic emphasis.)
Still, such reversals are stylistically marked and often reserved for parallel structures or chiastic arrangements in prophetic and poetic texts.
Ordinal Numbers in Construct Chains
When ordinal numbers appear in construct chains, the ordinal loses the definite article even when the entire phrase is definite. This follows standard construct grammar rules.
Example:
יוֹם שְׁלִישִׁי לַחֹדֶשׁ
“The third day of the month”
Here, the ordinal שְׁלִישִׁי is in the construct position and therefore unmarked by the article הַ־, even though the full phrase is contextually definite.
Ordinal Numbers as Nominal Heads
Ordinal numbers can function independently as the head of a noun phrase, particularly in listings, chronological sequences, or ritual rubrics. For example:
וּבַיּוֹם הַשְּׁמִינִי
“And on the eighth day”
In these cases, the ordinal implies the noun by ellipsis. The understood noun is usually יוֹם (“day”) or another regularly implied item in context.
Syntax in Narrative and Legal Contexts
In narrative texts, ordinal numbers often mark temporal progression. Their syntactic placement is fixed in formulaic expressions:
וַיְהִי בַּיּוֹם הַשְּׁבִיעִי
Such constructions begin clauses and introduce new narrative segments. In legal texts (e.g., Leviticus), ordinal numbers organize laws and procedures:
בַּיּוֹם הַשְּׁלִישִׁי יִכַּבֵּס
In both genres, the ordinal is embedded in complex syntactic structures but maintains its attributive or temporal function.
Stylistic and Semantic Nuances
Ordinal numbers can also carry symbolic or ritual significance. The “third” or “seventh” day often implies completion, purification, or covenant fulfillment. For example, the seventh day often marks rest and sanctification, while the third day may indicate decisive divine action.
These layers of meaning mean that the placement of ordinals is not only grammatical but also charged with theological symbolism. Therefore, understanding their position helps illuminate discourse structure and narrative pacing.
Exploring the Role of Ordinals in Discourse Flow
Ordinal numbers serve as anchors in Biblical Hebrew discourse. They segment text into events, laws, oracles, and ritual cycles. Their consistency in phrase structure—typically noun + ordinal adjective—provides coherence to long passages, especially in priestly and chronological materials.
When used anaphorically or to resume previously introduced concepts (e.g., “on the third”), ordinals may appear without an explicit noun, relying on context for clarity. This economy of expression is a hallmark of Hebrew literary style.
Patterns Worth Remembering
Construction | Example | Usage |
---|---|---|
Definite Noun + Definite Ordinal | הַמֶּלֶךְ הָרְבִיעִי | Attributive agreement |
Ordinal in Construct Chain | יוֹם שְׁבִיעִי לַחֹדֶשׁ | No article on ordinal |
Elliptical Ordinal | וּבַחֲמִישִׁי | Implied noun (e.g., “day”) |
Predicative Ordinal | הַשָּׁנָה שְׁלִישִׁית | Descriptive; no article on ordinal |
Final Observations on Ordinal Placement
Ordinal numbers in Biblical Hebrew occupy a syntactically consistent but semantically rich position. Whether marking time, describing order, or conveying theological patterns, they exhibit regular grammatical behavior with layered literary effect.
Understanding their placement—before or after the noun, with or without the definite article, in construct or free form—enhances one’s reading of Hebrew narrative, law, and poetry alike.