The Differences Between Hebrew and Aramaic

Hebrew and Aramaic are two closely related Northwest Semitic languages that have played significant roles in the history of the ancient Near East and the development of religious texts, including the Bible and the Targums. Both languages emerged from the same linguistic family and influenced each other over centuries, shaping the way religious, legal, and everyday texts were written and transmitted. They were spoken across vast regions, including Israel, Mesopotamia, and parts of Persia, and became integral to the cultural and spiritual identities of various peoples.

Hebrew, traditionally regarded as the sacred language of the Israelites, was the primary language of the Hebrew Bible and remained a crucial part of Jewish religious and cultural life. It persisted through different stages, from Biblical Hebrew to Mishnaic and Medieval Hebrew, eventually undergoing a modern revival in the 19th and 20th centuries. Aramaic, on the other hand, rose to prominence as a lingua franca across the ancient Near East, serving as the administrative language of empires such as the Assyrians, Babylonians, and Persians. Over time, it became the spoken language of many Jewish communities, influencing rabbinic literature, including the Talmud and various translations of the Hebrew Scriptures.

While Hebrew and Aramaic share similarities in vocabulary, sentence structure, and writing systems, they also have notable distinctions in phonetics, grammar, and linguistic evolution. Aramaic adopted influences from other languages, including Akkadian and Persian, while Hebrew retained more conservative linguistic features rooted in its ancient biblical form. Despite these differences, their coexistence within Jewish communities led to significant bilingualism, allowing for the preservation of Aramaic elements in Jewish prayer, scripture, and commentary.

This article explores the key differences and historical interactions between Hebrew and Aramaic, highlighting how these two languages have influenced religious traditions, linguistic developments, and cultural exchanges throughout history. By examining their phonological, grammatical, and lexical distinctions, we gain a deeper understanding of their unique identities and their interconnected roles in shaping ancient and modern Semitic languages.

1. Historical Background and Geographic Distribution

Hebrew

Hebrew is the classical language of the Israelites and the Hebrew Bible (Tanakh). It was spoken primarily in the land of Israel from around the second millennium BC. Over time, it evolved from Classical Biblical Hebrew to Mishnaic Hebrew (spoken during the Second Temple period) and later to Medieval and Modern Hebrew. After Hebrew ceased to be a spoken vernacular around AD 200, it remained a language of liturgy and scholarship until its revival in the 19th and 20th centuries.

Aramaic

Aramaic, on the other hand, was originally spoken by the Arameans and became widespread throughout the ancient Near East, particularly after the Assyrian and Babylonian empires expanded. By the 8th century BC, it had become the diplomatic and administrative language of the Neo-Assyrian Empire, later replacing Hebrew as the common spoken language of many Jewish communities. During the Second Temple period, Aramaic was the dominant spoken language in Palestine and throughout the Jewish Diaspora, influencing later Jewish writings, including the Talmud.

2. Phonetic and Phonological Differences

Consonantal Differences

  • The Hebrew letter ח (ḥet) is pronounced as a pharyngeal fricative ([ħ]), while in Aramaic, it often became a softer velar fricative ([x]) or was sometimes even lost.
  • The Hebrew letter ע (ʿayin) is traditionally a voiced pharyngeal fricative ([ʕ]), but in many dialects of Aramaic, it weakened to a glottal stop ([ʔ]) or disappeared entirely.
  • Hebrew retains תּ (tav with dagesh, /t/) and ת (tav without dagesh, /θ/), whereas in Aramaic, ת frequently became ד (dalet), leading to shifts like Hebrew מִתּוֹךְ (mitokh, “from within”) → Aramaic מִדּוֹךְ (midokh).

Vowel Differences

Aramaic generally exhibits a simpler vowel system than Hebrew:

  • Classical Biblical Hebrew distinguishes between long and short vowels, while Aramaic tends to level vowel length distinctions.
  • The Hebrew qibbuts (ּ‎ֻ, /u/) often corresponds to patah (ַ, /a/) in Aramaic.
  • Example:
    • Hebrew: מֻלְכָּא (mulkā, “kingdom”)
    • Aramaic: מַלְכוּ (malku, “kingdom”)

3. Grammatical Differences

Verb Conjugation and Tense Usage

One of the most striking differences between Hebrew and Aramaic is in their verb conjugation patterns.

Perfect and Imperfect

  • Hebrew: אָמַר (amar) – “he said”
  • Aramaic: אֲמַר (amar) – “he said” (similar)
  • Hebrew: יֹאמַר (yomar) – “he will say”
  • Aramaic: נֵאמַר (ne’amar) – “he will say” (different prefix)

The Pe’al vs. Qal Stem

  • Hebrew: כָּתַב (katav, “he wrote”) – Qal
  • Aramaic: כְּתַב (ktiv, “he wrote”) – Pe’al

4. Script and Writing System

Both Hebrew and Aramaic share the same square script today, known as the “Ashuri script,” which was adopted from Imperial Aramaic during the Babylonian exile. However, earlier forms of Hebrew were written in Paleo-Hebrew script, which resembled the Phoenician alphabet. Aramaic also developed regional variations, such as Syriac script in Eastern Christian traditions.

5. Lexical Differences

Concept Hebrew Aramaic
King מֶלֶךְ (melekh) מַלְכָּא (malkā)
God אֱלֹהִים (Elohim) אֱלָהָא (Elahā)
Son בֵּן (ben) בַּר (bar)
House בַּיִת (bayit) בֵּיתָא (baytā)

6. The Role of Each Language in the Bible and Jewish Tradition

Hebrew in the Bible

Hebrew is the primary language of the Tanakh (Old Testament), except for a few portions written in Aramaic.

Aramaic in the Bible

Aramaic appears in portions of the Bible, particularly in:

  • Daniel 2:4b–7:28 (narratives and visions)
  • Ezra 4:8–6:18; 7:12–26 (imperial correspondence)
  • Jeremiah 10:11 (a single Aramaic verse)

Additionally, the Targums (Aramaic translations of the Hebrew Bible) were widely used in Jewish communities.

7. Influence on Other Languages

Aramaic, as a lingua franca, influenced Hebrew and many other languages, including Arabic and Persian. Hebrew, after its revival in the modern era, incorporated some Aramaic elements but maintained its distinct grammatical structure.

Understanding the Distinctions Between Hebrew and Aramaic

Hebrew and Aramaic are closely related but distinct languages with differences in phonology, grammar, script, and vocabulary. Both languages have played significant roles in the history of the Jewish people and the broader Near Eastern world, shaping religious traditions, legal texts, and everyday communication for centuries. While Hebrew was the original language of the Israelites and the primary language of the Hebrew Bible, Aramaic emerged as a dominant linguistic force in the ancient Near East, influencing Jewish scholarship, trade, and governance.

Despite their differences, the deep linguistic ties between Hebrew and Aramaic allowed for mutual borrowing and adaptation, particularly in the realms of religious literature and liturgy. The presence of Aramaic in portions of the Hebrew Bible, the widespread use of Targums, and the extensive Aramaic content in the Talmud all attest to the intertwined histories of these languages. Additionally, both languages evolved over time, adapting to the needs of their speakers and influencing the development of other Semitic and non-Semitic languages.

Understanding the distinctions between Hebrew and Aramaic is essential not only for linguistic scholars but also for students of biblical studies, historical theology, and Semitic languages. These differences provide valuable insight into the cultural exchanges that shaped the Jewish diaspora and the linguistic evolution that led to the modern forms of Hebrew and Aramaic used today. Whether in biblical exegesis, historical research, or linguistic analysis, recognizing the nuances of these two languages enriches our appreciation of their lasting impact on history, religion, and culture.

About Biblical Hebrew

Learn Biblical Hebrew Online
This entry was posted in Grammar. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.